Survival and prognostic factors in conventional G1 chondrosarcoma | World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Full Text

Survival and prognostic factors in conventional G1 chondrosarcoma | World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Full Text



World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Survival and prognostic factors in conventional G1 chondrosarcoma

• Julian Fromm, 
 
• Alexander Klein, 
 
• Andrea Baur-Melnyk, 
 
• Thomas Knösel, 
 
• Lars Lindner, 
 
• Christof Birkenmaier, 
 
• Falk Roeder, 
 
• Volkmar Jansson & 
 
• Hans Roland Dürr 

World Journal of Surgical Oncologyvolume 17, Article number: 155 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Background

Chondrosarcoma is the second most frequent malignant bone tumor. Grade I chondrosarcoma (syn.: atypical cartilaginous tumor) is classified as an intermediately and locally aggressive neoplasm and typically is treated less aggressively (i.e., by intralesional curettage). Does the data regarding local recurrence (LR) and metastatic disease justify this?

Methods

From 1982 to 2014, 37 consecutive patients with G1 chondrosarcoma had been resected or curetted. The margin was defined as R0 (wide resection) or R1 (marginal resection). All patients were followed for evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease. Overall and recurrence-free survival were calculated, and various potentially prognostic factors were evaluated.

Results

In 23 patients (62%), the tumor was widely (R0) resected, whereas in 14 patients, (38%) the resection was marginal (R1). Overall survival was 97% after 5 years, 92% after 10 years, and 67% after 20 years. Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 96%. Ten-year local recurrence-free survival was 83%. Local recurrence-free survival showed a significant correlation to margin status but no correlation to location or age. None of the patients with local recurrence died during the follow-up. One patient had metastatic disease at initial presentation, and a further five patients developed metastatic disease during follow-up. Metastatic disease proofed to be a highly significant factor for survival but was not correlated to local recurrence.

Conclusions

There was no significant correlation between the outcome and the primary tumor location. Marginal resection was a risk factor for LR, but there was no significant difference in the overall survival in patients with or without LR. Metastatic disease (16%) was more common than expected from the literature and a significant predictor for poor overall survival.