Tuesday, June 25, 2019

Glycerol content within the WHO ethanol-based handrub formulation: balancing tolerability with antimicrobial efficacy | Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control | Full Text

Glycerol content within the WHO ethanol-based handrub formulation: balancing tolerability with antimicrobial efficacy | Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control | Full Text



Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

Glycerol content within the WHO ethanol-based handrub formulation: balancing tolerability with antimicrobial efficacy

  • Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  •  and
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control20198:109
  • Received: 27 April 2019
  • Accepted: 6 June 2019
  • Published: 

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) ethanol-based handrub (EBHR) formulation contains 1.45% glycerol as an emollient to protect healthcare workers’ (HCWs) skin against dryness and dermatitis. However, glycerol seems to negatively affect the antimicrobial efficacy of alcohols. In addition, the minimal concentration of glycerol required to protect hands remain unknown. We aim to evaluate the tolerance of HCWs to the WHO EBHR formulation using different concentrations of glycerol in a tropical climate healthcare setting.

Methods

We conducted a cluster-randomized, double-blind, crossover study among 40 HCWs from an intensive care unit of a tertiary-care hospital in Brazil, from June 1st to September 30, 2017. We tested the WHO EBHR original formulation containing 1.45% glycerol against three other concentrations (0, 0.5, and 0.75%). HCWs used one formulation at a time for seven working days during their routine practice and then had their hands evaluated by an external observer using the WHO scale for visual inspection. Participants also used a WHO self-evaluation tool to rate their own skin condition. We used a generalized estimating equations of the logit type to compare differences between the tolerability to different formulations.

Results

According to the independent observation, participants had 2.4 times (95%CI: 1.12–5.15) more chance of having a skin condition considered good when they used the 0.5% compared to the 1.45% glycerol formulation. For the self-evaluation scale, participants were likely to have a worst evaluation (OR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.11–0.49) when they used the preparation without glycerol compared to the WHO standard formulation (1.45%), and there were no differences between the other formulations used.

Conclusion

In a tropical climate setting, the WHO-modified EBHR formulation containing 0.5% glycerol led to better ratings of skin tolerance than the original formulation, and, therefore, may offer the best balance between skin tolerance and antimicrobial efficacy.

Keywords

  • Hand hygiene
  • World Health Organization
  • Alcohol-based hand rub
  • Glycerol
  • Skin tolerability
  • Essential medicines list
  • Low-income countries

No comments:

Post a Comment